Below are the top 5 most viewed posts of 2013. Of other posts the most viewed includes “What exactly is HMRC paying Capgemini billions for?” and “Somerset County Council settles IBM dispute – who wins?“.
Last month he said in a Guardian comment that central government departments are “increasingly being held hostage by a handful of huge, often overseas, suppliers of customised all-or-nothing IT systems”.
Some senior officials are happy to be held captive.
“Unfortunately, hostage and hostage taker have become closely aligned in Stockholm-syndrome fashion.
“Many people in the public sector now design, procure, manage and evaluate these IT systems and ignore the exploitative nature of the relationship,” said Thompson.
The Stockholm syndrome is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages bond with their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them.
This month the Foreign and Commonwealth Office issued a pre-tender notice for Oracle ERP systems. Worth between £250m and £750m, the framework will be open to all central government departments, arms length bodies and agencies and will replace the current “Prism” contract with Capgemini.
It’s an old-style centralised framework that, says Chris Chant, former Executive Director at the Cabinet Office who was its head of G-Cloud, will have Oracle popping champagne corks.
Outsourcing to India and losing IBM mainframe skills in the process? The failure of CA-7 batch scheduling software which had a knock-on effect on multiple feeder systems?
As RBS continues to try and clear the backlog from last week’s crash during a software upgrade, many in the IT industry are asking how it could have happened.
Universal Credit’s Programme Director, Hilary Reynolds, has stood down after only four months in post. The Department for Work and Pensions says she has been replaced by the interim head of Universal Credit David Pitchford.
Last month the DWP said Pitchford was temporarily leading Universal Credit following the death of Philip Langsdale at Christmas. In November 2012 the DWP confirmed that the then Programme Director for UC, Malcolm Whitehouse, was stepping down – to be replaced by Hilary Reynolds. Steve Dover, the DWP’s Corporate Director, Universal Credit Programme Business, has also been replaced.
Edward Donald, the chief executive of Reading-based Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, is reported in the trust’s latest published board papers as saying that a Cerner go-live has been relatively successful.
“The Chief Executive emphasised that, despite these challenges, the ‘go-live’ at the Trust had been more successful than in other Cerner Millennium sites.”
A similar, stronger message appeared was in a separate board paper which was released under FOI. Royal Berkshire’s EPR [electronic patient record] Executive Governance Committee minutes said:
“… the Committee noted that the Trust’s launch had been considered to be the best implementation of Cerner Millennium yet and that despite staff misgivings, the project was progressing well. This positive message should also be disseminated…”
Royal Berkshire went live in June 2012 with an implementation of Cerner outside the NPfIT. In mid-2009, the trust signed with University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre to deliver Millennium.
Not everything has gone well – which raises questions, if this was the best Cerner implementation yet, of what others were like.
Some people, including those in the know, suspect Universal Credit will be a failed IT-based project, among them Francis Maude. As Cabinet Office minister Maude is ultimately responsible for the Major Projects Authority which has the job, among other things, of averting major project failures.
But Iain Duncan Smith, the DWP secretary of state, has an ace up his sleeve: the initial go-live of Universal Credit is so limited in scope that claims could be managed by hand, at least in part.
The DWP’s FAQs suggest that Universal Credit will handle, in its first phase due to start in October 2013, only new claims – and only those from the unemployed. Under such a light load the system is unlikely to fail, as any particularly complicated claims could managed clerically.