Universal Credit IT working well claims DWP

By Tony Collins

Staff in job centres working on Universal Credit system are writing jobseekers’ personal information down on paper because their IT systems are so “clunky and cumbersome”, Dame Anne Begg, chair of the Commons’ Work and Pensions Committee, told Civil Service World.

“When we visited the Bolton Jobcentre Plus the IT system seemed clunky and cumbersome,” Begg said. Staff making appointments for UC applicants at the Bolton pilot scheme “had to write out some of the [jobseekers’] personal details, just to transfer them from one computer system to another. That’s something that we would have expected to be ironed out.”

The handwriting of jobseekers’ details “could lead to transposing errors”, she said.  Further, the Universal Credit IT system doesn’t allow jobseekers to save their data midway through an online application, Begg said.  She warned that this will penalise those who don’t own computers, who will have to remember to take all of their personal details in one batch to open access computers such as those at local libraries.

But a spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions said:

“The IT supporting Universal Credit is working well and the vast majority of people are claiming online. Making a claim to Universal Credit in one session… helps ensure the security of a claimant’s information.”

Last month a leaked survey of staff at the Department of Work and Pensions who are working on Universal Credit programme found dishonesty, secrecy, poor communications, inadequate leadership and low morale.

Computer Weekly reports that the DWP placed just 0.5% of its Universal Credit IT spending directly with SMEs, and that the department’s major suppliers – Accenture, Atos, BT, IBM, Capita, HP and SCC – subcontracted little to SMEs. “The Universal Credit supply chain flowed downstream mostly to multinational technology suppliers such as Oracle, Nuance, Genband and RedHat.” Most Universal Credit IT spending has gone to Accenture, IBM and HP: £57m, £41m and £34m respectively, between January 2011 and May 2013.]

Comment

While keeping secret internal reports on the Universal Credit IT project, and while all the signs are that Universal Credit’s IT is in trouble – it’s easier to handle claims at least in part by hand – the DWP’s senior officials, spokespeople and Iain Duncan Smith are telling the public and Parliament that all is well.

Perhaps the next logical step is that they come onto the public stage in costume to tell us nursery tales, while playing stock characters who sing, dance, and perform skits. Maybe then they’ll be more believable.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Universal Credit IT working well claims DWP

  1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10252450/Prepare-to-add-HS2-and-Universal-Credit-to-our-depressing-list-of-fiascos.html

    Universal Credit is a more promising candidate to join the sorry litany of government debacles. This is the system that will replace the last government’s flawed tax credits, Gordon Brown’s fiendishly complex mechanism for wealth transfer that managed to entrench welfare dependency while wasting billions of pounds through incompetent administration and inadequate IT.

    The new Universal Credit is intended to be a simpler approach, which has the added advantage of ensuring that it will always pay to be in work rather than on benefits. It is a good idea whose rationale is both administrative and ideological. The trouble is that it relies upon so many imponderables – in particular, an IT system able to track myriad different individual decisions – that it is easy to see disaster written all over it. If it is to work, then the most complex IT project ever seen needs to be put in place, linking systems operated by PAYE and HM Revenue and Customs.

    Will we, in a few years’ time, be considering how and why this turned into a calamity costing us all billions of pounds? Recent reports are hardly auspicious. A leaked staff survey carried out at the Department for Work and Pensions suggested that officials working on the scheme are scathing of its chances of success. One said: “After 29 years of service this has been the most soul-destroying work I have done.” Another: “We are in the third review in 16 months, no roll-out plans, no confidence in going forward and stakeholders losing confidence in our ability to deliver.” Secrecy is another tell-tale indicator that something is going wrong. Rumours abound of computer failures and waste on a vast scale, but so little information is coming out that it is hard to know what is going on, though Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, has signalled a complete rethink – and this, let us remember, is the Coalition’s flagship welfare reform project.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s