By Tony Collins
The contrast between what Google looks for when hiring staff and what Whitehall looks for when making some of its top appointments, could give clues as to why many government IT-based projects and programmes fail.
First, the strengths Google looks for. These were set out yesterday on BBC R4 by Laszlo Bock, human resources chief at Google for 10 years.
Google was named “Best Company to Work For” more than 30 times around the world and received over 100 awards as a top employer during Bock’s time.
In 2010, he was named “Human Resources Executive of the Year”. Under him, Google changed its clunky, arduous recruitment processes that relied on gimmicks like maths puzzles to those that helped the company grow to about 60,000 employees in less than two decades.
In 2015 he published his first book, The New York Times bestseller Work Rules!, a practical guide to help people find meaning in work and improve the way they live and lead. He resigned from Google in 2016.
On the BBC “Analysis” programme on Monday evening – which looked at intelligence and talent and what they mean, if anything, in job interviews – Bock said the least important attribute Google screens for is whether someone knows about the job they are taking on. Crunching the data on successful hiring led Google instead to look for these characteristics:
- A sense of responsibility not to quit until the job is done well
- Comfort with ambiguity
- A sense of fun
“It’s about the importance of people being able to raise their voices in organisations. One of the things that happens is, when organisations get large, people stop raising their voices and really bad things happen as a result. That’s where you get whistleblowing, insider trading, all kinds of things.
“Human beings are evolved, biologically, as social, hierarchy-seeking animals. We tend to conform. So courage is important because the really innovative, creative stuff comes from ‘I got this crazy idea’ and the bad problems get flagged by people who are willing to raise their hand and say ‘I don’t think this is a good thing to do’.
“Without that you can’t do great things.”
It’s too easy to generalise about the hiring and appointment of senior civil servants. But it’s possible to understand a little about the hiring culture within Whitehall’s biggest department, the Department for Work and Pensions.
An insight into DWP culture and thinking can be gleaned from the many Lever arch folders of documents filed by the DWP as part of an FOI case in which it spent several years fighting to stop the release of documents about the Universal Credit IT programme.
The documents include DWP witness statements on the “harm” that would be caused if the IT documents in question were published.
The judge in the case, Chris Ryan, challenged most of the DWP’s arguments.
In one of his rulings, Judge Ryan described the DWP’s claims as:
- alarming and surprising
- close to fanciful
He said that public confidence in the Universal Credit IT programme had been maintained for some time “on a false basis”; and he raised the possibility that an “unhealthily collegiate relationship had developed” between the DWP and private sector IT suppliers. [Campaign4Change will publish a separate blog post on this ruling in the next few days.]
As well as the insight into DWP culture that one can gain from the FOI case, it’s possible to gauge culture and thinking within Whitehall departments from the talented, free-thinking IT individualists who have joined the top layer of the civil service, quit and returned to the private sector.
It would be invidious to pick out some names as there are so many.
What all this suggests is that Whitehall’s culture appreciates conformity and consensus and shuns boat-rocking.
When top IT professionals who joined HMRC and the DWP spoke publicly at conferences about institutional problems that needed to be tackled, mandarins reacted quickly – and such disclosures were never repeated.
And after a leak to the Guardian about the results of a DWP staff survey of morale on the Universal Credit IT programme, the department launched a formal leak inquiry headed by a senior member of the security services.
At the same time, Universal Credit IT programme documents were no longer emailed but transferred around in taxis.
This bout of nervous introspection (the judge described the DWP’s arguments in the FOI case as “defensive”) when taken together with what else we know, indicate that Whitehall’s culture is insular, distrustful and inimical to open challenge and problem-solving (though there are some within the senior Whitehall ranks who successfully defy that culture).
When Bock talks of conformity being a danger within large organisations he would not have had the DWP in mind – but he aptly describes its culture.
When he speaks about the “importance of people being able to raise their voices in organisations” he was probably unaware of the extent to which Whitehall culture abhors raised voices.
As Bock says, when people don’t raise their voices “really bad things happen as a result”. Perhaps the lack of internal challenge was one reason the NHS IT programme – NPfIT – lost billions of pounds, and the DWP’s Universal Credit programme went badly awry for several years.
When Bock says the “really innovative, creative stuff comes from ‘I got this crazy idea’, he could have been describing the culture of the Government Digital Service. But that refreshing GDS culture is being slowly choked by the conservatism of traditional Whitehall departments.
As Bock says, “the bad problems get flagged by people who are willing to raise their hand and say ‘I don’t think this is a good thing to do’.” But bad problems are things senior civil servants avoid talking about, even internally. A Disneyland”good news” culture pervades central departments.
A National Audit Office report on the Universal Credit programme referred to a “fortress mentality” within the DWP.
Maybe the consensus-seeking John Manzoni, head of the civil service, and his colleague Sir Jeremy Heywood, Cabinet Secretary, could seek to employ Bock as an adviser on appointments and recruitment.
Bock’s brief? To turn around the senior civil service’s culture of conformity, groupthink, denial, selective use of “good news” facts and a lack of open challenge.
Recognising the destructiveness within a big organisation of having the wrong culture – as Bock does – could be the start of a genuine Whitehall transformation.
BBC R4 “Analysis” on talent, intelligence and recruitment
Thank you, Tony.
As it’s Valentine’s Day, I don’t want to say anything unkind or cynical.
Thus, I do hope that, those who are in an upward trajectory, will take notice of your blog and will be able to distinguish between two systems. The ‘traditional’ one which inevitably leads to decline, delay and corruption and the other, that champions higher levels of existence and has the potential to benefit all.
Thank you for the comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person